
“Maybe the pressure of Wembley was just too much.”
Wembley Stadium, London — In a stunning twist at the 2025 FA Cup Final, Erling Haaland once again left fans and pundits questioning his composure under pressure. The Norwegian striker, who has been a prolific scorer for Manchester City all season, opted not to take a crucial penalty during the 1-0 loss to Crystal Palace, handing the ball instead to Omar Marmoush. The decision backfired immediately as Marmoush’s effort was saved by Palace goalkeeper Dean Henderson, cementing City’s first defeat at Wembley this season.
The Penalty Moment
With City awarded a spot-kick late in the second half, the expectation was clear: Haaland, the club’s talisman and league top scorer, would take it. However, in a move that left the 90,000-strong Wembley crowd stunned, Haaland stepped aside, allowing Marmoush to step up. Henderson, anticipating the switch, guessed correctly, diving to his right to make a decisive save.
Post-match, Pep Guardiola offered a calm but puzzled explanation:
“I thought he [Haaland] would want to take it, but they didn’t speak. In moments like that, it comes down to feeling. They decided Omar was ready. Unfortunately, it didn’t work out.”
The miss proved pivotal. Despite dominating possession and creating numerous chances, City failed to find the equalizer. The early 16th-minute strike by Eberechi Eze secured Crystal Palace’s first major trophy, leaving City stunned and questioning the decision-making of their star forward.
Social Media and Expert Reactions
The footballing world erupted immediately after the match, debating Haaland’s choice. Former Manchester United captain Wayne Rooney didn’t hold back:
“Erling Haaland is a world-class forward, no doubt. But if that’s Messi or Ronaldo in that moment? They’re not handing that ball to anyone. That’s the difference between superstars and legends — they’re selfish in front of goal. Maybe the pressure of taking a penalty at Wembley just got to him. He’s human.”
Similarly, Micah Richards, ex-City defender, expressed disbelief:
“Haaland is normally confident, sometimes arrogant even. For him not to step up… that’s just not the Haaland we know.”
The debate has taken over social media platforms, with fans divided. Some sympathize, citing the enormous pressure at Wembley, while others argue that a player of Haaland’s caliber should never shy away in a cup final.
Haaland’s Wembley Curse
Despite his prolific scoring record this season—30 goals in all competitions—Haaland’s record at Wembley continues to cast a shadow. He has now failed to score in six consecutive games at the stadium and has missed three of his last seven penalties.
This stands in stark contrast to last season when Haaland netted 52 goals in 53 appearances, helping City secure a historic treble. Yet, the Wembley struggles have raised questions about his mental fortitude in high-pressure moments. Haaland himself admitted in a recent BBC interview that his form at the national stadium had been “horrific,” a sentiment only deepened by Saturday’s defeat.
Dean Henderson: The Hero
Crystal Palace goalkeeper Dean Henderson played a crucial role in the upset. Post-match, he revealed that he had anticipated Marmoush would take the penalty:
“I wasn’t sure if Haaland would step up, but when he gave it away, I just knew where Marmoush was going. I told myself I’d save it, and I did.”
Henderson’s save not only preserved Palace’s lead but etched his name into club folklore as the Eagles claimed their first major trophy in 119 years.
City’s Broader Struggles
Saturday’s defeat is part of a worrying trend for Manchester City at Wembley, marking their second consecutive FA Cup final loss at the stadium, having fallen to Manchester United in 2024. The result underscores a broader narrative: while City dominate domestically and in Europe, moments of high-stakes pressure seem to expose vulnerabilities, even among their stars.
The match also highlighted a transitional period for the club. Kevin De Bruyne played what could be his final match for City, while teenage Argentine talent Claudio Echeverri made his debut on one of football’s biggest stages. Micah Richards remarked:
“City need a rebuild. Pep has said it. The players haven’t been at the level they were in recent years.”
The Penalty Debate: Superstars vs. Legends
The FA Cup final sparked discussions about leadership, accountability, and the psychology of penalty-taking. While Haaland has proven himself capable of incredible feats throughout his career, critics argue that stepping aside in a pivotal moment undermines a superstar’s legacy. Fans often measure greatness not only by goals scored but by how players handle defining moments under immense pressure.
For City supporters, the decision to let Marmoush take the penalty raises uncomfortable questions: should a player of Haaland’s stature ever hand off such responsibility in a final? And if not him, then who?
What’s Next for Manchester City
For City, the season is far from over but the stakes are high. Their domestic campaign now hinges on securing a top-five finish in the remaining two league games. Anything less would mark a disappointing end to a season that began with high expectations of silverware and domination across competitions.
For Haaland, the spotlight will follow him closely. Wembley may continue to be a mental hurdle, and the pressure to restore his reputation in critical moments will be immense. Guardiola and the City hierarchy face decisions about leadership, mental coaching, and how best to harness their world-class talent in high-stakes matches moving forward.
Final Thoughts
As Palace celebrated their historic triumph, Haaland remained on the pitch, medal around his neck, his gaze distant. For football fans, pundits, and fellow professionals, the question lingers: should a superstar ever hand off a penalty in a final?
Saturday’s FA Cup Final will be remembered not just for Palace’s long-awaited victory but for the conversation it reignited about leadership, responsibility, and the pressures that even elite athletes face under the brightest lights.
Fans can weigh in and discuss: should Haaland have stepped up, or was passing the penalty a reasonable decision under the circumstances?




